Spelling and Grammar Resource

May 24   |   Posted by: joe

Here’s a website I found today:

http://spellcheckplus.com/

It’s an online spell-checker.  Common sense would lead me to hope that most people on here, being proficient enough with a computer to set up an account here, would probably have a good word processing program with an automatic spell-checker - heck, even Firefox spell-checks these days and is correcting me as I type this.

But in reality, people can, from time to time, post things in the workshop full of errors.  No, spell-checkers aren’t foolproof.  No, they don’t account for intentional straying from rules for artistic purposes.  No, they can’t do dialect.  But, those have been the case a minority of the time, from what I can tell.  Spell-checkers aren’t able to help you if you’re not willing to use them.

No one’s a perfect speller or grammar guru.  But technology is good these days, and resources are at our fingertips, and it’s easy to get pretty close.  The workshop is here as a resource for everybody, but that doesn’t mean it should be used as a proofreading.  If you can fix up the spelling and grammar and punctuation before posting something on the workshop, you will get better feedback, period.  You will have more readers, and more readers will read all the way to the end.  If a reader happens to notice an honest mistaken use of a homonym, they usually point it out, but generally it’s along with a substantial comment on the meat of the piece.

The other benefit from an online spell-checker, and this particular site, I should mention, is its utility to non-native English speakers.  Having tried, with varying degrees of success, to learn three other languages, I can appreciate the level of difficulty in making oneself understood at all, much less to write creatively in another language.  This site, (again, http://spellcheckplus.com/ ) is aimed specifically at ESL writers, although it can easily be toggled to give advice geared more to native English speakers.  With our humble little site becoming more global all the time, we’re going to have increasingly more writers with other first languages.  And while we don’t now have the same infrastructure set up outside of English language writing, we can do our best to help non-native speakers become better writers in English.  Be kind with your comments, but don’t be shy about addressing common mistakes.  English is a complicated language with complicated rules and terrible exceptions to all of them.  It’s a nightmare to learn, even as a first language.  Anyone remember spelling tests as a kid?  You don’t need ‘em in Spanish, because Spanish spelling makes sense!

Anyway…

It helps everyone to spell-check your writing before posting it.  So spend the extra minute and make it pretty.  Thanks.

What I’m Doing to Improve as a Writer

May 17   |   Posted by: joe

One thing I really want to do on the new site (and, in the meantime, on this blog) is to collect and/or produce helpful resources for other writers.  I certainly don’t know everything there is to know about writing (nor will I presume to), and therefore will be looking in plenty of dark corners for new insight.  I use this site as a primary resource for improving my writing, and I would hope to be able to offer some of my own experience back as a resource for others. As one evolving writer to a community of evolving writers, I thought I could share some of what I’ve been through so far, and new things as they reveal themselves.  I’m interested in trying to help writers who sincerely want to improve and become better writers, because that’s what I want for myself.  (What that means is, although I often will write “you,” I really mean, “me.”   If my advice is “You need to finish that short story you started weeks ago,” it means I started a short story MONTHS ago and my roommate got us cable, so I’m gaining weight and not word count.)

 

Today I got some notes from Sarah, in what was a bit of serendipitous timing, to zap my ass into gear.  One of the pledges I made was to post on this blog once a week – something I’ve failed to do for these two weeks since making that promise.  This coincided with me reading a bit of stirring writing advice which prompted me to make a schedule for myself.  Hence, this post.

 

Something that I almost always forget, and I’d wager many others forget as well, is that writing is WORK.

 

Writing can be fun, and there’s no reason it shouldn’t be, but to be even a little bit serious about it requires discipline.  And I’m sure it’s the most common, clichéd bit of writing advice out there and there’s no way to say it that hasn’t been said before, but that doesn’t make it any less true or less useful.  It’s something that I’ve known for years, and preached all along, but it’s much easier said than done.

 

If you want to write anything that’s any sort of good, if you want to write more than once and write more than one thing, if you want to write something that’s longer, or, worse, shorter, and above all, if you want to be READ by other people, then be prepared to spend a lot more time writing than you thought it would take.  You can’t just sit down for five minutes every few months and expect Shakespeare to pour out.

 

It’s hard to do when the only thing motivating you to write is you.  Most of us on this site aren’t professional writers.  Some of you are in college, though, and you have the external motivation of writing for classes.  And this is fantastic – take advantage of it while you can.  I was my most prolific (to date) in college – magazine deadlines, due dates for fiction classes, submission deadlines for lit journals.  The difference between writing in college and writing for public consumption is that in college, you get to PAY people to give you deadlines.    After college, you have to get good enough to deserve an editor or publisher pushing you around with a deadline.  Then, maybe, maybe, maybe, you get paid. 

 

And if you don’t ever make a dime at writing, that’s fine.  Not everyone expects to, or maybe even cares to.  Most of the people here (myself included) are traveling on the writing road, not quite sure where it goes.  Some of us have gone farther than others.  Some are going faster, some slower, some might have stopped at a state liquor store.  Maybe a few will take the first exit they see, maybe a few won’t even notice anything but what’s directly in front of them. 

 

But if you’re on this workshop, then chances are, you identify yourself with that slippery notion of being a Writer.  (Heaven’s sakes!) 

You might say to yourself, “Well, I write things, but I wouldn’t call myself a writer…”

 Well, why the heck not?  That’s pretty much the definition! 

“But I don’t do it for a living…”

Neither did any professional writer, at first, but publishable material doesn’t just come out of thin air.  Every single professional writer was once an unpaid, unpublished, amateur writer, but a writer nonetheless. 

 

Thinking of yourself as a writer, and thinking of writing as work, are fundamental.  Everything else comes from there.  It’s work that won’t make you any money at first, or maybe ever – in fact, it’ll cost you money: pens and paper, computers and printers, schools, workshops, stamps and submission fees, coffee, booze, anxiety medication, corrective eyewear, and of course books to read, because you can’t write in a vacuum.  But you do what you have to to write.  I also cook in a restaurant and substitute teach, but I don’t identify myself chiefly as either of those things.  Maybe some of you identify first as a parent or a student or a firefighter or a wizard, and that’s awesome, but none of those mean you can’t say, “…and I’m a writer, too.”

 

So now that we’re all telling the world we’re writers, well, we have to back it up by writing. 

Which means working at writing.

It means setting regular times to write, and thinking about it like going to a job or a class, and you can’t just skip because no one will slap your wrist.  It means setting concrete goals for how much you get done before you stop, and not checking to see what’s on TV.  It means revising, regularly and ideally with a bit of distance, because nothing’s too good to get tossed out, and nothing’s too bad to get a second look.

 

I’ve set aside my writing time (on paper it looks like a college class schedule), I’ve set my goals for output (weighted and complex as a tax plan) and I’ve got a support network writing community (mad as hatters, every last one of ‘em, and for some reason perpetually olive-green). 

 

I know what I need to be doing.

Now I need to sit down and do it.

 

(And if I don’t write another one of these on time next week, someone yell at me!)

the writoracle

May 14   |   Posted by: juliek

some of us writoricians met up a few weekends ago to discuss the future of the writoracle as well as many other exciting thoughts we have in the works.

one item that was discussed was the idea to have members of thewrit.org community submit articles for publication in the same way that poetry/prose/fiction is submitted. this way we will be able to craft a very different publication every time. this is also another way that everyone in the community can participate to put together a really well rounded and diverse publication. if you don’t think we have enough articles about music-go ahead and write us an article! if that new poetry anthology that just came out isn’t your favorite-write a review! we are very open to all types of articles. if you’re worried about the possible content of your article please do not hesitate to send me an email (juliek@thewrit.org).

we will not be publishing an issue of thewritoracle until the new website is up and running and we do not have a definite time frame for the new website as of yet, but i encourage anyone who has written an article and would like it considered for our first publication on the new site to email me (juliek@thewrit.org) with your articles.

Poetry Advice from Charles Simic

May 08   |   Posted by: Jeremiah

Charles Simic on Writing Poetry from the Library of Congress

**The internet is full of wonderful pieces of information. The Library of Congress website, kind of a square one of American Poetry, contains some interesting links, from Poetry Webcasts to the following petite list of suggestions from current Poet Laureate Charles Simic. I enjoy these not only for their simplicity, but for outlining the mentalities that surround crafting poems. Not quite as epic feeling as Letters to a Young Poet, but a good piece of perspective. Hope you like it — Jeremiah**

A few things to keep in mind while sitting down to write a poem:

Charles Simic from Library of Congress Website

  1. Don’t tell the readers what they already know about life.
  2. Don’t assume you’re the only one in the world who suffers.
  3. Some of the greatest poems in the language are sonnets and poems not many lines longer than that, so don’t overwrite.
  4. The use of images, similes and metaphors make poems concise. Close your eyes, and let your imagination tell you what to do.
  5. Say the words you are writing aloud and let your ear decide what word comes next.
  6. What you are writing down is a draft that will need additional tinkering, perhaps many months, and even years of tinkering.
  7. Remember, a poem is a time machine you are constructing, a vehicle that will allow someone to travel in their own mind, so don’t be surprised if it takes a while to get all its engine parts properly working.

List of Online Publications you admire, and why:

Mar 25   |   Posted by: Jeremiah

I wanted this message/thread to list those online publications whose site you frequent. With each entry please include the following:
1. Name of publication

2. Link to publication

3. Type of work most featured (poetry, fiction, essays, mix)

4. What do you feel is the publications strength, possibly including, but certainly not limited to, the following:

a. strength of writing – include examples
b. strength of visual layout – specifics (color, column width, etc)
c. strength of readership – who reads these? what are their comments as readers?
d. mission statement
e. freshness of authors – is these just the same old faces?

Some ideas to get the ball rolling. I know this might take a bit of effort for each publication, but it really will help shape what we should be striving toward and patting ourselves on the back for. It will also help define our “niche” a bit more concretely.

NOTE: I did a quick search and there are more to look at here. Check out some and add your thoughts!

Foraging shiny things

Mar 07   |   Posted by: Jeremiah

The writ is refocusing its collective energy to become a more complete go-to for new writers. To do this we need every one’s help!

If you have been on the writ for a while you’ll have noticed the “challenges” section on your homepage. Throughout the years challenges have been varied, from “help name the writ” to “write a piece about change.” The responses always vary from poignant to hilarious. All in all it’s a way to be more involved in the shaping and community of the Writ as a whole!

Currently we have some CRUCIAL challenges for young and old, new and seasoned.

First is the Resource Library Project. I want to call special attention to this because I have found that to be part of the greater online writing community you need to be involved in the discussions, news, and writing of more than just the Writ.  This is the chance to let the writers on the Writ who is putting out great online journals, which print journals you enjoy, your sources for writing news and even great articles that you feel everyone should read.  We want to hear your voice!

Secondly, to get a better feel for what may have been missed by those were gone and/or to get some more acclaim for some of the “golden oldies” you can submit Writ pieces to the “That which needs to be read” challenge.  It’s always good to show your successes and this is a great way to show the best of the Writ.

Your input is so important to making this a better community and resource for new AND established writers, so get on out there and challenge yourself!

Hacked! Yuck!

Feb 28   |   Posted by: Sarah Dopp

Hi Everyone,

If you  tried to access The Writ this morning, you may have been surprised to learn that we destroyed the workshop in favor of becoming a PayPal phishing site.  Unforunately, this strategic business move (that I’m proud to say I had absolutely nothing to do with) failed to produce revenue for The Writ staff, and we have shut the operation down.  You’ll have to take your paypal payments over to PayPal.com from now on.

No, but seriously… some evil fingers slithered into our site through an unsecured script (my money is on that old forum, and all traces of it have now been removed from the system), and wreaked some havoc on us.  We’ve 80% recovered, but I could use your help tracking down that last 20%.

If anything is still broken, please comment and tell me about it so I can try to track down the unbroken files.

Thanks!

Sarah

Prose monkey back in the trenches!

Feb 17   |   Posted by: joe

Hey there to all you fiction writers!  Feeling unappreciated?  Me too!  That’s why I’ll again be spending significant time in the workshop focusing just on fiction.  There’s not a lot of it on there, and even less with comments.  As a fiction writer myself, I know how frustratring it is to spend days, weeks, even months working on a short story, then posting it and…nothing happens.  So, let me say now that I’ll be doing my best to make sure every short story gets at least one meaningful constructive critique.  Hopefully this will encourage all you fiction writers to get back in there, writing and posting your short stories, then re-writing and re-posting them until the cows come home. 

(And if you feel like helping me out with this admittedly thankless task, by all means, please comment away on the stories by your peers!  They love it!  And maybe then they’ll read your stuff, too!)

Beardedly yours,

Joe G

joe@thewrit.org

Now Accepting Submissions for WRIToracle

Feb 10   |   Posted by: Sarah Dopp

Hey WRIToricians! We’re now accepting submissions for the Spring 2008 edition of WRIToracle! Here’s how to put your writing in front of our editors’ eyes:

  1. Log into My Writ (or register for an account if you’re new).
  2. Choose Add Writing from the My Writing menu.
  3. Follow the instructions there to add your latest and greatest writing to the workshop.
  4. Choose Submit for Issue from the My Writing menu.
  5. Select your two best pieces of work from the workshop.
  6. Click Submit.

Your pieces will be reviewed by our editing staff and considered for the next issue of WRIToracle.

Please note that we only consider pieces of writing that have been added to the workshop and marked as submissions. We’ve also emptied the inbox of past submissions, so your only competition is the people who submit their work now.

If you have any questions about the upcoming issue or would like to help with it, please contact JulieK at juliek at thewrit dot org.

Discussion: Journalistic vision

Feb 04   |   Posted by: Jeremiah

Over the past few days, when I’ve been stimulated by the reorganization of the writ.org, I’ve been thinking of Writoracle and what direction things could take. To that End I would like to keep this entry and its contents for links and discussion concerning how other online and print journals are looking at the relationship of writer / editor, submissions, and journalistic vision.

I will try not to throw other peoples arguments and views in without chiming in, but here are some of the writings I’ve found online in the last few days that I suggest people read:

|: Albums vs. Singles @ tier 3.

||:Journal Bill of Rights @ Rhubarb is Susan

Both these entries work on framing the importance of journals as a relationship. The discussion at Tier 3 focuses more on the relationship of journal readers to poets. It is important in the flood of writing experienced at the writ.org and elsewhere that we realize that poetry is doing just fine, a sentiment expressed by current poet laureate Charles Simic in a NYTimes interview. I understand that as a venue for extremely fresh writers it is difficult to focus in on just a few, but with our “unlimited” space comes a chance for highlighting more writers and artists. We are not limited to paper and should not feel hemmed in by those restrictions.

Rhubarb focuses in on the relationship of poets and editors. I assert that it is much more difficult to give due to poets with a larger sampling of their work if the poet does not take the time to craft a mini-collection worth the due giving. When so many online and print journals are staffed by volunteers I feel that it is well stated to give them a little respect by taking the time to honestly tailor submitted work.

I feel at the unique juncture of the writ readers, writers, and editors are more connected as a community than generally found. I hope that by having an open discussion we can solidify these bonds positively and bring the community even closer together.